Latest Stories
Electronic Frontier Foundation
-
Is Your State’s Child Safety Law Unconstitutional? Try Comprehensive Data Privacy Instead
October 03, 2023
-
EFF And Other Experts Join in Pointing Out Pitfalls of Proposed EU Cyber-Resilience Act
October 03, 2023
-
The State of Chihuahua Is Building a 20-Story Tower in Ciudad Juarez to Surveil 13 Cities–and Texas Will Also Be Watching
October 03, 2023
-
GAO Report Shows the Government Uses Face Recognition with No Accountability, Transparency, or Training
October 03, 2023
The Intercept
-
White House Faces Calls to Stop Ex-Guantánamo Detainee’s Forced Return to Russia
October 03, 2023
-
Rep. Josh Gottheimer Headlines No Labels Call While Eyeing Run for Higher Office
October 02, 2023
-
Amazon and Google Are Finally Facing the Music
October 01, 2023
-
New Group Attacking iPhone Encryption Backed by U.S. Political Dark-Money Network
October 01, 2023
VTDigger
-
Ex-Brattleboro police officer banned from working in Vermont law enforcement
October 03, 2023
-
‘The chickens coming home to roost’: Balint and fellow Dems join hardline Republicans in ousting Speaker McCarthy
October 03, 2023
-
7 sentenced in connection with 2019 fatal shootout in Burlington
October 03, 2023
-
2 days of food, music in Montpelier will celebrate businesses’ return after floods
October 03, 2023
Mountain Times -- Central Vermont
-
October’s eclipse
October 03, 2023
-
Your weekly horoscope, Oct. 4-10, 2023
October 03, 2023
-
Your weekly horoscope, Sept. 28 – Oct. 3, 2023
September 28, 2023
-
Great Gulf announces design team for village at Killington Resort
September 28, 2023
What explains this outburst of panic among a certain cohort of elites? Control and regulation are obviously at the center of the story, but whose?
During the proposed half-year pause when humanity can take stock of the risks, who will stand for humanity? Since AI labs in China, India, and Russia will continue their work (perhaps in secret), a global public debate on the issue is inconceivable.
Still, we should consider what is at stake, here. In his 2015 book, Homo Deus, the historian Yuval Harari predicted that the most likely outcome of AI would be a radical division -- much stronger than the class divide -- within human society. Soon enough, biotechnology and computer algorithms will join their powers in producing “bodies, brains, and minds,” resulting in a widening gap “between those who know how to engineer bodies and brains and those who do not.”
In such a world, “those who ride the train of progress will acquire divine abilities of creation and destruction, while those left behind will face extinction.”
(more)
READ MORE: Project Syndicate